This is the final part of my Vertigo analysis, I hope you’ve enjoyed it!
Themes
Hitchcock Examination/”Confession”
Much has been said of Hitchcock’s meticulous crafting of all his leading ladies into short-haired blondes. Vertigo references this in how Scottie remakes Judy into his idealized woman, Madeleine. In that way, it’s a very interesting self-reflection of Hitchcock’s own tendencies, perhaps an examination of why he’s so particular about his female leads–chasing an obsession of a woman he loved and lost. Even Hitchcock himself has called Vertigo his most personal film.
Power and Freedom
The three male characters with the most lines (the third being Pop Leibel) all utter this phrase with the same intended meaning even as they do so in totally removed contexts. This is so subtle I didn’t notice the repetition for a long time, but once I did I couldn’t ignore it. This is Gavin’s motive for killing his wife. Pop implies that there are many stories of men doing likewise in one way or another, and speaks almost wistfully about it, as if they were some grand old days to be looked back on with reverence. Scottie says it derisively to Judy in reference to Gavin’s reward for the successful murder.
Aside from Gavin, nobody in this film is powerful and free at the same time. Scottie is free to do as he pleases, being “a man of independent means, as the saying goes.” But he’s not powerful considering his crippling disorder, how he’s just given up on his life’s ambition of being chief of police, and he’s having debilitating nightmares. Pretty soon Scottie won’t be free either, as his attraction to Madeleine clouds his judgment and enslaves him to his own desires. Midge and Judy similarly torture themselves because of their attractions to Scottie, both are also stuck in unfulfilling jobs they clearly don’t really enjoy as well.
Looking at it more generally, women have power over men; being ensnared by attraction diminishes a man’s freedom. Men can provide for women and give them freedom, but assert their own power economically and sexually over the objects of their attraction in return. The film seems to be asking us if these two attributes are attainable, especially together, in the modern world. And the answer seems to be that, no, they’re not. The only possible solution comes at the end, where Scottie promises to Judy that they’ll both be free after they climb the tower. In doing so, Judy dies and it’s implied Scottie will too. The only way to escape the devastating co-dependent interplay of the sexes, and the modern civilized world with all its trappings, is through the eternal release of death.
The Power of Narrative
In many ways, Vertigo is like a film within a film, and Scottie is an audience member who becomes engrossed in a narrative crafted specially for him. As ridiculous as Gavin’s story about possession may be, we accept it without question…because it’s a movie and that’s how they work. The concept would not be introduced if it served no narrative purpose, or else it’s just wasted screentime, so we take it at face value. Scottie seems to follow our lead, becoming completely sucked in by the story he’s been given by his second meeting with Gavin, rather than looking for holes in the plot or searching for the common sense truth. When a story is told well (and you’re not a joyless SOB like CinemaSins) those things don’t matter because we want it to be real.
As other reviewers have said, the movie could roughly be divided into segments of Scottie going from passive observer, to inserting himself into the movie he’s watching, to directing his own movie by the end. That’s an interesting thought, but with regards to the theme of narrative I think the point is more that, as crazy as the entire plot of the film is, it doesn’t matter. The journey, the characters, the emotion…all the elements of film-making working together can manipulate us so that we willfully ignore the inconsistencies. Just like Scottie, we are completely duped by the most insanely complicated murder plot ever conceived, and somehow we don’t care because the journey was so satisfying. That’s the power of a great story. By the end of the film, even Judy has been so bewitched by the Madeleine/Carlotta narrative she helped create that she believes a ghost is emerging from the shadows rather than considering a more logical explanation.
Deconstructing Film Tropes
At the same time, so much of Vertigo is almost an anti-movie. It’s the crossroads between Citizen Kane (a well-done straightforward story, the teacher’s guide to how film techniques work) and 2001: A Space Odyssey (an abstract art film that intentionally breaks all those rules but is still effective in spite of it). This is a mystery where the conclusion is revealed with 40 minutes to go. It’s also a romance where the love interest doesn’t talk until 40 minutes in. It’s a talkie with multiple long stretches of silence. Instead of feeling “real” it almost plays out like a dream, considering: 1) the nonsensical plot, 2) hazy graveyard, 3) inexplicable darkening of the bookstore during Pop’s exposition dump about Carlotta, 4) the remade Madeleine’s entrance from an unearthly green haze, 5) flashing back to the horse carriages during the 360° kiss, 6) as well as the trippy nightmare and title sequences… they all help create that aesthetic. We’re not sure what we can trust because neither the characters nor the laws of realism are consistent. Every audio-visual detail seems exaggerated to provoke an emotional response rather than depict an accurate portrayal of real life. In doing so, Hitchcock is taking full advantage of the medium of motion pictures beyond just filming a stage play as many of his predecessors opted to do.
In particular, Vertigo is a subversion of film noir. It’s in color, first of all. It begins with a death, but rather than set up the mystery as is tradition, it sets up the protagonist’s physical and psychological vulnerabilities. The detective is completely hapless and duped by the antagonist from the beginning, blinded by his emotions, and only discovers the truth at the very end when his mark slips up. This is in stark contrast to Sam Spade or the dozens of other hard-boiled detectives of the genre, all of whom are supposed to be one step ahead of everybody else. The femme fatale is really just a plain, simple country girl with no ulterior motive, who breaks convention by submitting to the man. Instead of the detective ultimately coming to his senses and rejecting her, she has manipulated him so well even she can’t control him anymore.
Rather than leave us with some cynical message of how corrupt the inhumane system is, Vertigo leaves us ruminating over how dysfunctional our own human emotions can be. There are several sections of the film that would be perfect dumping grounds for narration, (and one or two are even written in the script) which is another staple of many noirs, but Hitchcock opted to let the visuals and music speak for themselves while our imaginations did the rest. It’s an anti-noir and an anti-film in many ways, while retaining and honoring (even mastering) the techniques of both at the same time. Hitchcock knew enough about the rules to understand which ones he could break.
Looks are Deceiving
Even outside their archetypes in the medium of film, nobody in Vertigo is exactly as they seem. Scottie is a sexually frustrated, disturbed creep beyond his nice guy exterior. Madeleine is really just Judy, an unsophisticated girl from nowhere. The kindly Gavin is really a vicious murderer. The ghost of Carlotta who scares Judy is really just a nun. All Madeleine’s supposed fits of apparition were really just carefully planned acting. Nothing and no one are what they claim to be. Even the innocuous Midge harbors unspoken romantic feelings.
Slaves to Our Emotions
Vertigo sheds light on how overpowering, and therefore terrifying, our emotions can be. How we can inexplicably fall in love with someone bad for us when there are other options available. How we strive to win over the aloof Scottie when it’s clear he’ll never be interested. How trauma can stay with us for years after the fact and influence our life trajectory. The only character who gets what he wants out of the story is Gavin, who has no emotions, at least none for others.
Love is Not the Answer to All Life’s Troubles
In almost all movies, then and now, the story ends when someone gets the girl. Love is the answer to all life’s problems, the reward for a job well done, and once the hero is set with his love interest we can assume it all worked out fine from there. Vertigo subverts this expectation as well. As described above, it’s a story about what happens when love goes wrong, when relationships are abusive and toxic. We see how love can be one-sided (Midge) and people who are unhappy in their marriages (Gavin). We see how love can sometimes be dependent on imprinting and fixation rather than compatibility or genuine bonding (Scottie). We see that guilt, pity and insecurity can taint how we think we feel about someone (Judy). We hurt the ones we love, sometimes intentionally and sometimes not, and often we act differently than our true selves in order to attract the people we want (Madeleine). Carlotta’s story repeats itself in Madeleine and Judy, as if men hurting women (and vice versa) is the true source of possession haunting humanity. An offhand comment from Pop implies that such circumstances are all too common throughout history. The film pairs love with the titular condition of vertigo, a feeling of dizziness, spinning and disorientation. It’s a fitting metaphor.
Madness
Vertigo explores the human psyche, how prone to damage it is based on our surroundings, and how hard it can be to pull back from psychosis once it has manifested. Scottie suffers from debilitating nightmares and PTSD both after his police partner died in the beginning and after Madeleine’s passing on his watch. He’s never truly the same man again in the film, and had to be institutionalized for an entire year. Madeleine suggests in an emotional outburst that her behavior only makes sense if she were mad—and assuming she wasn’t an actress leading Scottie on, she’s probably right. It doesn’t make for a good story, but if these characters were real they’d all need serious therapy. Vertigo also blurs the line between love and madness, the crazy things we do to ourselves and others for the sake of it, how irrational it makes us. None of Scottie’s actions, at least in the second half, and none of Judy’s in the whole film, make any rational sense. Were it not for the convenient excuse of love, we would say they are mad.

Motifs
Bars
There are a lot of prominent vertical and (less frequently) horizontal bars, lines and ridges throughout the movie. More often than not, Scottie wears a tie with stripes on it. He notably switches from a blue checkered tie at Gavin’s office to a red striped one later that day when he goes to Ernie’s and sees Madeleine for the first time. There are bars on the outside windows when Madeleine goes to get her flowers. The outside of the art gallery and McKittrick hotel have prominent pillars (mirroring the one seen in the Carlotta portrait) and a metal fence all creating the same barred “texture” on screen. Its more of a stretch, but the banisters in the McKittrick hotel and pillars (plus the wires) of the Goldengate Bridge could be part of the same aesthetic. Nearly every surface in Scottie’s apartment, at least the living room area where he and Madeleine talk, has noticeable ridges or stripes on it: from the fabric pattern on the back of the chair to the ruffles in the curtains and lampshades, to his blinds pulled down and the brick texture of his fireplace as well as the metal grating there. The sequoia trees might also qualify. And at the Spanish mission, there are the stone pillars outside and then when we cut into the stable, the camera holds on the exterior, where Scottie and Madeleine stand haloed by the vertical stripes on the doors and horizontal wooden beams from the ceiling. There’s a noticeable metal fence outside Scottie’s hospital room where he’s unresponsive. When he watches Judy go up to her hotel room, the building behind him has a prominent horizontal striped pattern.
This might be a coincidence if there were only a few instances. But as is, it’s far too often and noticeable in the film not to have been deliberate, especially when considering Hitchcock’s attention to detail in all other aspects of the production. I think the idea is pretty clear as well—it’s supposed to look like a cage or evoke the feeling of confinement. And it represents how, for nearly the entire film, Scottie is trapped. He’s ensnared by Gavin into this dream world, and he’s unable to escape his emotional longing for Madeleine. He’s not a man in control of the situation nor acting of his own rational free will. Tying this into the theme of power and freedom, it’s showing that Scottie lacks both in his pursuit of a woman. Considering the pillar in Carlotta’s painting, the bars—at least the pillars specifically—might also be a callback to her and the possessive influence she represents, how men and women prevent each other from having both power and freedom.
Circles/Spirals
Circles and (occasionally,) spirals are another noticeable visual cue. The red nightgown Madeleine wears when she first meets Scottie, the collar and sleeves of Judy’s green dress when she meets him again, as well as Scottie’s tie when he’s finally living happily with his “new Madeleine” all have notable polka dots on them, and so does the one he wears when they first kiss. Madeleine and Carlotta both have a distinct “swirly” hair bun. Circles become a lot more common in the second half of the film, with the chair in Scottie’s bedroom before the nightmare, as well as the chairs in Ernie’s, all have circular backs. This is in addition to the pictures on the walls at Ernie’s too. When Madeleine emerges from Scottie’s bedroom and they exchange their first words, there’s a notable circular wall ornament in the frame. When Judy is getting new shoes, there’s a spirally case perfectly behind her. In the hair salon when she’s getting her hair dyed, there’s a brilliant circular white light in the other room. Most famously, the opening credits are full of iconic neon spirals rotating in and out of existence.
These circular shapes all represent the obsessive singular moments—points suspended in time—that Scottie seeks to return to and relive forever. Spirals represent constantly coming back to those memories again and again, unable to escape their orbit. Madeleine has become Scottie’s center of gravity, the sun to his world(view).
Fire/Lights
Fire is Scottie’s element.
Fire is fragile and fleeting yet all-consuming and dangerous. It’s typically associated in our culture with passion and attractiveness. Fire produces light and warmth, as Scottie tries to shine light on this dark mystery (while keeping Carlotta, represented by shadows, in check) and is initially caring to those around him. Scottie has a fire going each time Madeleine/Judy appears in his apartment, and on the first and last of these three occasions he prompts her to sit by it. Initially it’s a comforting and a thoughtful gesture, but in the second act it’s creepy and just the latest example of Judy getting “burned” by his single-minded passion. There’s a great shot of Madeleine with the fire behind her, symbolizing Scottie’s blossoming passion and lust (or, perhaps, how dangerous that passion is). The fire escape sign outside Judy’s apartment tries to warn both of them to run away before they get burned by this passionate flame. Too much fire, or just getting too close, is deadly. Like lust, a small controlled sample might be nice but it can quickly become a raging inferno if left unchecked.
Plants/Flowers
Plants, the products of the Earth, are Judy/Madeleine’s element.
Plants need water and light/warmth to live, but an excess of either is deadly, as Gavin and Scottie kill Madeleine along with Judy respectively, after appearing to be supportive of them. (Remember from my analysis of Gavin that his element is the ocean.) Scottie throwing logs on the fire could be subtle visual foreshadowing of how he will harm Judy to fuel his desire. Madeleine falling into the bay might be another, especially when paired with the image of the flowers submerged in the blue-black water with her. Plants are passive, helpless and used in homes for aesthetic purposes. They’re green, like Madeleine’s color and we see a ton of plants throughout the film, especially in conjunction with her. Her first stop is to a flower store, and then the cemetery she goes to next is filled with plants. There is a bouquet in the portrait of Carlotta and even a separate picture of flowers next to it in the frame. There are plants in Gavin’s office and the gentleman’s club when he and Scottie discuss Madeleine. The McKittrick hotel’s caretaker is surrounded by plants and mentions tending to them.
There are pictures of flowers in Judy’s apartment and her room in the McKittrick hotel. Scottie pins a flower on Judy and there are flowers at the hair salon as she becomes Madeleine. Midge unwisely brings red flowers to Scottie as he’s recuperating in the hospital, and the wall behind him is consumed by ivy—both representing the fact that Madeleine still fresh on his mind. Most famously are the Sequoia trees Scottie and Madeleine go to on their first “date” where he utters one of the key lines of the movie “always green, ever-living,” forever tying her to the color and the plants that come with it. The tree rings and flowers also join in with the aforementioned circular motif at the same time. Flowers are circular objects within plants, which serve both purposes, representing Madeleine herself and, for Scottie, those “perfect moments” he wants to return to and relive forever.
Mirrors
With the exception of the one at Ernie’s where we first see Madeleine, there are no mirrors in the film until Judy comes into the picture. Then we have several scenes of her in front of a mirror. This is because she is a reflection of Madeleine—the same, but slightly off. Alternatively, it’s because she forces Scottie to see and confront his own reflection, his own dark side. Madeleine lived in the moment where with Judy, the focus is entirely on her looks, objectifying and controlling her through them, like a woman doing hair and makeup in front of the mirror. Even that first shot of a mirror at Ernie’s could represent a visual clue to the viewer that the Elsters have another side to them they haven’t revealed to Scottie yet.

Repetitions
The chase in the beginning matches the chase of Madeleine up the tower, with the vertigo shot and music cues being the link, as well as what it means for Scottie—failing due to his fear of heights yet again.
Midge listening to Mozart while talking to Scottie is mirrored in her apartment at the beginning and the hospital where he recuperates.
Scottie says “hey! Wait a minute!” to Midge before they visit Pop and she repeats the same phrase to him after they leave.
Scottie admiring Madeleine at Ernie’s, the art gallery and outside her apartment will be mirrored after Scottie searches for the dead Madeleine in vain later. The famous profile shot at Ernie’s will be mirrored as he drives Madeleine to the sequoias, then when sees Judy for the first time and again in Judy’s apartment after their first date when she’s in silhouette.
Madeleine opening the window of the McKittrick hotel to check for Scottie will be repeated by Judy at the Hotel Empire.
Scottie prompting Madeleine to sit in front of the fire of his apartment will be repeated with Judy. As will him prompting her to drink a shot of liquor to alleviate pain—the second instance however, the pain is caused by his own actions. He even says the same thing both times: “drink this straight down, just like medicine.”
Madeleine/Judy and Scottie kiss only four times in the whole film—the beach, the horse carriages, and twice in Judy’s apartment. The blue, then black then green backgrounds in each instance represent the external forces that created yet doomed their pairing, those being Gavin/deception, Carlotta/possession, Madeleine/obsession. The first kiss is genuinely touching and romantic. The second is desperate and strained. The third is tragic and horrifying. (The fourth might not even count to be honest—it’s a few shorter pecks on the lips as opposed to one sustained smooch, they’re further away from the camera and the music is quieter. But regardless, it’s an interesting role reversal of the second in front of the carriages. This time Judy is the one trying to enjoy the moment while Scottie is preoccupied with the tower when in kiss #2 it was the other way around.)
Similarly, the two times they drive to the mission are mirrors of each other. In each, Scottie is smiling while Judy/Madeleine is apprehensive. Of course, the second time around Scottie is smiling with sinister intentions rather than selfless admiration.
Three times we see Scottie, then Scottie and Judy, then Judy alone walking through the hallway of her hotel building in front of the fire escape sign, representing their many opportunities to walk away from this toxic delusional relationship.
Scottie asks Madeleine where she is twice, at the forest and in the stable. Both times she responds “here with you.”
There is a large fan on the wall of Ernie’s where Scottie first sees Madeleine, and a very small fan on the wall of Judy’s apartment when he first sees her. A small visual cue that they’re the same, and yet another example of Judy being a diminished Madeleine.
Scottie takes Judy/Madeleine to the Mission twice, where they climb the tower together. Each instance has three vertigo shots each from his POV.
OVERALL these repeated scenes/actions/visuals make the film feel self-contained, as if we are trapped in a cycle we can never break free from. Again, it’s similar to the thought processes of a person with obsession, constantly cycling back to the same memories endlessly. Along with the score doing the same, the background info on Carlotta (a legacy Madeleine is predicted to repeat and Judy unwittingly fulfills) as well as the visual motifs of the bars and spirals, this repetition creates a feeling that we are trapped by destiny. Touching on the theme of madness, the definition of insanity is repeating the same actions yet expecting a different outcome, as Scottie does reliving his old relationship. Regarding the theme of possession, it furthers the idea that we are trapped and acting out the machinations of a malevolent force.


Another good article Cassandra. I’m glad I had the opportunity to watch this movie with you! Good to see you found time to do some writing. But I miss being with you!
LikeLike
Impressively thorough and cogent analysis of Vertigo! Could easily be a monograph in book form like the ones I’ve been reading on Vertigo lately. Thank you for sharing your thoughts.
To step back from the analysis of Vertigo to the process of creation and analysis, I sometimes wonder if creators put all the thought in that analysts do, or if much of the elements and connections arise intuitively. For example, the bars reflecting power and freedom; did Hitchcock actually say to himself, this story is about power and freedom and I’ll have many vertical stripes and bars to reflect that, or did they arise from his subconscious as he assembled elements. Or do serious viewers read things into works that were never consciously or subconsciously intended? I’ve never created something of anywhere near the magnitude of a film, so I can’t speak from personal experience, but I know that the small things I do create usually arise without much intense thought. Probably the answer is all of the above!
LikeLike
Cassandra, I would love to see you write an essay on what impact Vertigo would have had if Vera Miles had played Madeleine/Judy.
I feel that it would have been a much colder Madeleine and Judy, because Miles stikes me as a much colder and more distant actress than Kim Novak.
Assuming that’s correct, I doubt that the kind of chemistry Stewart and Novak had on screen would have occurred between Stewart and Miles. Miles would have had to have done one hell of an acting job to achieve anything like the vulnerability that Novak showed.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ill have to watch more of her films to suss that out!
LikeLike
If Vera Miles had played Madeleine/Judy (as originally intended), I feel that she would have played much more the willing accomplice to murder than Novak played (Novak has even said that, from her own standpoint, Judy as Madeleine didn’t feel like an accomplice, and may not have even been aware that the murder was going to occur).
So I’m not sure Miles could have convinced me that she, as Judy/Madeleine could have either loved or fallen in love with Scottie. Miles (e.g., in Psycho) is a very strong, assertive, even somewhat masculine kind of actress. Can that kind of woman allow herself to become submissive in a relationship with a man like Scottie?
To me, Miles as Judy/Madeleine simply wouldn’t have worked, or at best, it would have been strangely unconvincing – – unless Miles had a hidden, kinky submissive side (I doubt that, very much).
LikeLiked by 1 person
I found very interesting the section in this essay that “places Vertigo at the crossroads” between Citizen Kane and 2001: A Space Odyssey.
The way you described Vertigo as being “dreamlike” helps to make it clear that in many ways, it is a truly surrealist film, which isn’t supposed to “make sense,” because it is after something more profound than merely telling a story. That’s why it affects the viewer so deeply and makes her want to re-watch the film or to dwell on certain aspects of it.
It is – as you’ve made clear – also a deeply existential film. Interestingly, there were many cross-currents (esp. in Europe) between existentialism, phenomenology, psychoanalytic theories, expressionism, and surrealism, as both a genre and a movement.
Artists such as the expressionist Edvard Munch (The Scream, The Kiss) and the surrealists (Magritte, Dali, DeChirico, etc.) had a strong impact on Vertigo and many of Hitchcock’s other best films. Hitch notably collaborated with Dali on the dream sequence in Spellbound. I believe that Munch’s (1897) The Kiss (and other similar paintings by Munch) was the direct inspiration for the passionate embraces between Scottie and “Madeleine” in which the two characters merge to the point of losing their individuality.
I think you’re onto something important when you raise the possibility that Hitchcock was questioning, in Vertigo, the possibility of true individual well-being in romantic relationships. I also have the feeling that there is something very Hamlet-like about Vertigo (to be, or not to be?).
Back to your point about the illogic, the uncanny, and the unexplained as being deliberate elements of Vertigo, I can add another fascinating piece to the puzzle:
As it turns out, there were actually two versions of the Portrait of Carlotta, shown in the museum scenes. First, when Scottie notices Madeleine sitting in front of the Portrait, Carlotta is dressed in a long, purple dress, and the Portrait is done in dark, foreboding hues. But then, toward the end of that scene in the museum, there is an eerie change in the music (a high-pitched violin plays), and as Scottie gazes at the painting from over Madeleine’s right shoulder, we now see –very briefly– an entirely different painting. This time, what Scottie sees is Carlotta wearing a light blue dress, and Carlotta’s head is leaning forward farther than in the purple-hued version.
It took me a few times of watching this scene at very slow motion to notice the differences. The differences were confirmed later in the film – – when Scottie revisits the museum, another young woman is sitting before the Portrait, which once again is the version of Carlotta in a light-blue dress with her head nearer to the center of the painting.
I didn’t discover this myself, but was alerted to it on a website discussing technical aspects of the film.
Discovering this sent a chill through me, much like the many other unexplained details and mysteries, such as the baffling/uncanny McKittrick Hotel scene. It struck me that Hitchcock really went all-out to undermine the viewer’s inclination to assume that everything in the film was ordinary reality. In essence, he was making what we might think of as an anachronistically psychedelic movie, with the colorful dream sequence having the most psychedelic impact of all.
I’ve noticed that some other surrealistic filmmakers, such as the great Luis Buñuel, set out intentionally to jar the viewer away from everyday reality, using disturbing, slyly naughty or humorous, and paradoxical imagery (things that shouldn’t, but somehow do co-exist).
Notably, Hitchcock, Buñuel, and Dali share two movies in common, with surreal sequences of eyes being cut in half (Spellbound dream sequence, and Dali/Buñuel’s collaborative short classic: Un Chien Andalou).
As much as Spellbound borrows from Dali/Buñuel’s Un Chien Andalou, I believe that Vertigo borrows more broadly from the whole body of Buñuel’s pre-1957 films.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I would be interested in anyone’s thoughts about the older woman, seemingly dressed like Carlotta, in Scottie’s dream/nightmare segment, for example, standing next to Gavin Elster by the window.
For me, this is the most terrifying image in the whole movie. It could give me nightmares, all by itself. I wonder if anyone else has had the same reaction.
I would also welcome anyone’s input on whom this woman is supposed to be (in Scottie’s imagining): Is it supposed to represent a much older 40 or 50 year-old Carlotta (which would be very odd since we know she died in her 20’s and appears to be in her 20s in the Portrait of Carlotta)?
What disturbs me is not just the age of this woman in Scottie’s nightmare, but the terrible scowl on her face, and her witch-like, very ugly (IMO) appearance. I’m sure if I saw such a woman on the street, it would definitely frighten me. I feel that it is a visage of evil.
One possibility is that, in Scottie’s dream-world, his unconscious mind is alerting Scottie to the possibility that there may be something tremendously evil about the older woman/Carlotta in the nightmare sequence. Is Scottie’s unconscious suggesting that the woman could have somehow been involved in the plot to kill Madeleine and destroy Scottie’s peace of mind?
Clearly, his mind in the nightmare seems to be implying a nefarious connection between the older “hag” and Elster. The “hag” looks up at Scottie, out of a darkness, and seems to have a guilty or evil look on her face, as if she herself might have been the murderer.
Another possibility is that the older woman is meant to be Scottie’s conjuring up an image of what the real Mrs. Elster might have looked like…but if this is true, why would Mrs. Elster look so evil & guilty in appearance?
A third possibility is that the older “hag” is actually meant to represent a terribly distorted image of Madeleine herself, as she is, deep inside – – a horrifying accomplice to murder .
This latter possibility terrifies me to contemplate that Scottie’s unconscious mind might have somehow “figured out” the whole plot – – that his detective genius might have unraveled the idea that the two who victimized him were Gavin and the false “Madeleine.”
In that event, then the “hag” may have been a distorted depiction of the “Madeleine” he had fallen in love with – – and all of his actions in the second half of Vertigo might have been motivated by a drive to not only solve the mystery, but also to get revenge on his personal tormentor (interesting that Gavin’s appearance in the nightmare is not distorted, and the depiction of evil is feminized).
My gut reaction suggests to me that this is the most disturbing and mind-shattering part of the nightmare…that Scottie somehow realized in the dream that the beautiful Madeleine was, in truth, a terrifying heriden or a representation of death itself.
LikeLiked by 1 person